Archive for July, 2009
Home price shows signs of life in region
Posted by Chas W. Leeper, SRA in Help for Buyers, Sellers & Homeowners, Help for Realtors / Brokers on July 20th, 2009
Median cost up slightly as a vigorous market emerges.
Merced County home sales prices rose an average of $5,000 in June to a median of $110,000.
“There was an overcorrection on the way down, just like there was when prices were going up,” said Craig Lewis, president of Prudential California Realty. “We’ve hit the bottom. I don’t think prices will move up rapidly, but they’ll rise slow and steady now.”
Credit a classic case of supply and demand.
“There are plenty of buyers at these prices, but not enough homes,” explained Lewis, who said his 300 agents sold a record number of houses during the last year.
Any house in decent condition priced less than $250,000 is getting multiple purchase offers. Some homes have more than 40 people competing to buy.
That competition is pushing up values.
Though prices rose 3 percent in June, there’s a long way to go before most homeowners will be happy. The median price paid for a Stanislaus home was $396,000 in December 2005.
Virtually every home purchased since 2001 is worth less now than it was then.
The same is true in Stanislaus and San Joaquin counties.
Stanislaus County home sales prices rose for the second straight month in June, jumping $4,000 to a median $139,000.
That’s the first two-month rise since the housing market began crashing 3½ years ago.
According to statistics released Thursday by MDA DataQuick, San Joaquin homes sold for a median $152,000 in June, which was the same as May but up $6,500 from April.
Northern San Joaquin Valley home values have fallen further than about any other region in America, and prices have been recovering more slowly.
Statewide, for example, the median-priced home sold for $246,000 in June, up 7 percent from May. Bay Area homes rose 3 percent to $352,000.
Just as it did a decade ago, the hefty difference between Northern San Joaquin Valley home prices and those elsewhere in California is attracting buyers to Stanislaus, San Joaquin and Merced counties.
“There are lots and lots of investors buying here. They think it is the time to get into the market,” said Chad Costa, a Re/Max Executive agent in Modesto who sold 500 homes last year.
Stiff competition Costa said investors making all-cash offers are tough for first-time buyers to compete with because they don’t have to convince lenders or appraisers that homes are worth what they’re willing to pay.
Home values are changing so frequently that appraised values can vary dramatically, and lenders won’t issue loans for more than what their appraiser determines a home is worth.
“If you get five appraisers, you’re going to get five different values,” said Costa, noting how frustrating that can be for buyers trying to close a deal.
Another big problem with the current market, Costa said, is that many vacant, foreclosed properties haven’t been put up for sale yet. Many bank-owned homes sit empty for months without any attempt to find a buyer.
But that’s starting to change.
Costa lists foreclosed properties for 30 banks, and he said those listings are increasing. Recently he has been listing two or three bank-owned homes for sale each day, which he said should help meet pent-up buyer demand.
“Don’t give up hope,” Costa advised buyers. “There’s going to be plenty of homes on the market in the next three to six months. The market is going to balance itself out.”
There certainly are plenty of homes in the process of being foreclosed on to quench buyers’ thirst.
During June alone, 749 Stanislaus homes were lost to foreclosure and more than 1,000 additional homeowners were told their homes are in jeopardy of foreclosure unless they catch up on delinquent mortgage payments.
Nearly 14 percent of all Stanislaus homeowners with mortgages are 90 days or more behind on payments.
Foreclosure activity is up in Merced County as well. In May, 17.4 percent of homes here were in some stage of the foreclosure process.
For the last couple of years, nearly all of the used homes sold in Stanislaus have been foreclosed properties or those at risk of being foreclosed on.
But that, too, is changing.
Increasing numbers of homeowners who aren’t in mortgage trouble are choosing to sell their current homes so they can buy elsewhere.
“It’s a secret in the real estate business: The very best time to buy a move-up home is during a down market like this,” Lewis said.
Here’s why: Even though homeowners must sell their current homes for relatively low prices, they may get even bigger bargains buying their next homes.
New FHA Reverse Home Mortgage a Boon to Seniors
Posted by Chas W. Leeper, SRA in Help for Buyers, Sellers & Homeowners, Help for Realtors / Brokers, Help for mortgage pros on July 15th, 2009
- Seniors can buy new home on reverse mortgage and not sell old home.
- New FHA plan helps seniors save thousands on closing costs.
- Little-known program features higher cash access this year only.
A new Federal Housing Administration, or FHA, reverse mortgage program can help senior homeowners relocate or downsize to a new home without giving up all their savings — and save them thousands of dollars in the process.
They don’t even have to sell their existing home first.
The program comes at a time when many financially strapped seniors are trying to boost their monthly incomes after being hit especially hard by the economic downturn: stock portfolio values plummeted, interest on investments shrank, and costs for health care and home repairs skyrocketed.
But help is now available through a new, but little known, FHA reverse mortgage program, known as the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, or HECM, for Purchase Program which gives seniors new ways to use equity in their homes. HECM loans have been available for several years.
The FHA developed the program because it noticed seniors were selling their homes, buying smaller, more affordable homes and then taking out reverse mortgages on the new properties. That meant they were paying closing costs twice — first on the real estate closing, and a mortgage if they needed one to make the purchase, and then again when they switched to a reverse mortgage.
Program combines costs
But now, the new HECM for Purchase Program allows seniors to buy a home directly with a reverse mortgage — paying closing costs only once, says Bill Glavin, special assistant to the commissioner of the FHA. A sale of an existing home is not necessary and is not part of this transaction.
The new HECM program allows using a reverse mortgage to buy a single-family home, a condo or a small multifamily residence, and allows them to convert some of the equity in their existing home to cash. They never have to make a single payment. Instead, they would collect monthly payments out of the equity on a tax-free basis as long as the home serves as their principal residence. If they did not sell their previous home, they could get additional income out of renting that property.
Under the plan, you can choose to take the money either in monthly payments, as a lump sum, a combination of the two or even in a line of credit that you can access whenever you need cash.
Higher amounts this year only
What’s more, this year, seniors can access up to $625,500 — up from $417,000 last year. In 2010, the amount reverts to $417,000.
Eligible homes can be one- to four-units, a condo approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, or a manufactured home that meets FHA requirements. You must agree to pay your taxes and make any necessary home repairs. No credit check or income verification is required — despite the current tight credit market.
To qualify for the program’s reverse mortgage, a senior, age 62 or older, must:
-
Agree to live in the house as a primary residence.
- Own the home outright or have enough equity to pay off any existing mortgages and equity lines with the proceeds from the reverse mortgage. Those with more equity may be able to access even more cash.
- Not be delinquent on any federal debt.
- Participate in a consumer information session given by an HUD-approved counseling agency or HECM counselor.
Most reverse mortgages range from 35 percent to 55 percent of the home’s equity. You can, however, take out a reverse mortgage as low as $10,000, though it is not recommended because of the costs involved, says Eric Bachman, CEO of Golden Gateway Financial, a firm specializing in matching lenders with borrowers. “Many times, seniors are just looking to pay off their forward mortgage and cover closing costs (usually less than $10,000) with a reverse mortgage, to get out from under monthly mortgage payments,” Bachman says.
Regardless of your income, the reverse mortgage pays you. The amount you can borrow depends on your age, current interest rates, and the appraised value of your home or FHA mortgage limits for your area, whichever is less.
How much you can borrow
Generally, three factors will affect the amount you can borrow:
- The value of your equity (the higher the better).
- Your age (the older the better).
- Interest rates (the lower the better).
Here are some hypothetical examples of how it can work:
- Julia is a 72-year-old who wishes to sell the home, worth $450,000, she owns free and clear in Ohio and wishes to downsize to a smaller home in Florida for $185,000, to be closer to her children and grandchildren. She decides to use the HECM for Purchase Program to buy her new home and will have more money leftover than if she used a straight purchase transaction. After she sells the house in Ohio, she can buy the Florida home using a $116,000 reverse mortgage and $69,000 cash. Now she owns the house in Florida and does not have to make any mortgage payment and has the $381,000 remaining from the sale of the Ohio home to invest, giving her extra income.
- Richard and his wife, both 75 years old, wish to move from their home in Georgia to a new home in New Mexico. Richard is concerned he won’t get a fair market price for his home because of declining home prices and wants to wait until prices rebound. They decide to use a HECM for Purchase Program reverse mortgage to buy the new home and retain the old home. This way they will not have to make mortgage payments on the new property, for which they paid $185,000. They also plan to rent out their current home as a way to generate additional income. They qualify for $116,000 reverse on the new property in New Mexico, so they pay the $69,000 difference from existing cash assets.
An additional benefit to the “for purchase program” is that you can’t outlive the loan because you can never owe more than the value of the home at the time you or your heirs sell the home. When you sell the home, you or your estate will repay the cash you received from the reverse mortgage plus interest and other fees to the lender. Any remaining equity belongs to you or your heirs.
These government-backed “for purchase” reverse mortgages are “no-recourse” loans, meaning if the borrower defaults, the lender’s recovery is limited to the sale value of the house. For example, if real estate values have declined at the time the loan comes due, and the home no longer is worth as much as the amount loaned, the FHA pays the lender the amount of the shortfall.
HUD recently clarified that the borrower cannot choose between paying the loan balance or paying an amount equal to the value of the home. Instead, when the loan is due, the borrower must either pay the balance due or default on the loan, in which case the bank sells the house and uses the proceeds to satisfy the loan.
However, even if that happens, you or your heirs will never owe more than the value of the home.
HECM loans are available only through an FHA-approved lender.
There are numerous calculators on such sites as AARP and Golden Gateway Financial that can help you determine which reverse mortgage is best for you.
Further information, including a list of FHA-approved lenders, is available free from the FHA.
One added cost to a reverse mortgage is an extra insurance premium, usually more than a conventional mortgage, which has to be paid by the homeowner to insure the lender against the possibility the homeowner lives longer than anticipated, says Bachman.
The insurance guarantees you will never pay more than a stated amount despite increased borrowing costs over time. More than 90 percent of all reverse mortgages in the United States are also HECM loans insured by the federal government through HUD. The insurance applies to the FHA mortgages. This insurance is what makes a reverse mortgage more expensive than a conventional or straightforward mortgage.
On a positive note, interest rates on reverse mortgages today are similar to conventional mortgages. In addition, fees associated with a reverse mortgage cannot exceed 2 percent of the first $200,000 and 1 percent of the balance, with a maximum of $6,000.
There’s another potential upside to having a reverse mortgage. “If the house appreciates in value, you benefit from the appreciation and can refinance the reverse mortgage for a higher amount and benefit from a larger revenue stream,” Bachman says.
Home Mortgage Rates Inch Down For Third Consecutive Week, Says Zillow
Posted by Chas W. Leeper, SRA in Help for Buyers, Sellers & Homeowners, Help for Realtors / Brokers on July 8th, 2009
RISMEDIA, July 8, 2009-The weekly average rate borrowers were quoted on Zillow Mortgage Marketplace for 30-year fixed mortgages decreased last week to 5.40%, down from 5.48% the week prior, according to the Zillow Mortgage Rate Monitor, compiled by real estate website Zillow.com®.
Meanwhile, rates for 15-year fixed mortgages fell to 4.79% from 4.87%, and 5-1 adjustable rate mortgages also fell to 4.49%, down from 4.65 the week prior.
Average Rate Average Rate
Mortgage Type Week ending 7/5/09 Week ending 6/28/09 % Change
30-year fixed 5.40% 5.48% -1.5%
15-year fixed 4.79% 4.87% -1.6%
5-1 ARM 4.49% 4.65% -3.4%
On Monday, rates for 30-year fixed purchase mortgages dropped further, with the average rate on Zillow Mortgage Marketplace at 5.31%.
Thirty-year fixed mortgage rates varied by state. Florida mortgage rates, and Georgia mortgage rates decreased the most, from 5.44% to 5.33% in Florida and from 5.42% to 5.32% in Georgia. Illinois mortgage rates, Massachusetts mortgage rates, New York mortgage rates and Ohio mortgage rates were the highest, each at 5.48%. Georgia mortgage rates were the lowest, at 5.32%. California mortgage rates were the most requested among all states.
Average 30-yr. Fixed Rate Average 30-yr. Fixed Rate
State Week ending 7/5/09 Week ending 6/28/09 % Change
Arizona 5.40% 5.48% -1.5%
California 5.39% 5.45% -1.1%
Colorado 5.39% 5.45% -1.1%
Connecticut 5.39% 5.47% -1.5%
Florida 5.33% 5.44% -2.0%
Georgia 5.32% 5.42% -1.8%
Illinois 5.48% 5.57% -1.6%
Maryland 5.44% 5.52% -1.4%
Massachusetts 5.48% 5.57% -1.6%
Michigan 5.43% 5.50% -1.3%
New Jersey 5.42% 5.49% -1.3%
New York 5.48% 5.54% -1.1%
North Carolina 5.43% 5.50% -1.3%
Ohio 5.48% 5.56% -1.4%
Oregon 5.43% 5.50% -1.3%
Pennsylvania 5.42% 5.47% -0.9%
Tennessee 5.39% 5.45% -1.1%
Texas 5.37% 5.45% -1.5%
Virginia 5.37% 5.45% -1.5%
Washington 5.39% 5.46% -1.3%
The Zillow Mortgage Rate Monitor is compiled each week using thousands of mortgage rates for conforming loans quoted on Zillow Mortgage Marketplace by mortgage lenders to borrowers who have submitted loan requests. State-level data is gathered for the top 20 states with the highest quote volume on Zillow.
HARP Guidelines Allow for 125% LTV. Originators Still Skeptical
Posted by Chas W. Leeper, SRA in Help for Buyers, Sellers & Homeowners, Help for Realtors / Brokers, Help for mortgage pros on July 2nd, 2009
HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan today announced that the Federal Housing Finance Agency has authorized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to raise the Home Affordable Refinance Program’s (HARP) loan to value (LTV) ceiling from 105% to 125%.
The Home Affordable Refinance Program was designed to assist borrowers who have demonstrated an acceptable payment history on their existing Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac owned mortgage loan. Unfortunately due to rising unemployment levels and increasing foreclosure rates, demand for housing has weakened and property values have continued to decline, which has blocked many borrowers from utilizing HARP.
The expansion of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s LTV guideline aims to expand qualified homeowner’s refinance opportunities. The underlying initiative is that lower monthly mortgage payments will raise real household incomes and therefore afford more spending power upon consumers. In a government press releases, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner stated…
“By expanding refinance eligibility, we can bring relief to more struggling homeowners more quickly. It’s a crucial step in our broader efforts to get America’s housing market and economy on the path to recovery.”
Thus far the effectiveness of the HARP program has faced many barriers. Among these roadblocks: lenders adding underwriting overlays and guideline restrictions, lenders all together not participating in the program, difficulty determining if Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac own your mortgage because of addresses not exactly matching the original note, additional costs because of lender imposed risk based loan level price adjustments (on top of GSE LLPAs), the unwillingness of banks to subordinate second mortgages, reluctant mortgage insurers, and the Home Valuation Code of Conduct.
Kent Mikkola, a mortgage consultant from Roseville, Minnesota says “Overall, it is difficult to obtain a HARP approval. Furthermore, it is even more difficult to find out why a seemingly eligible borrower has been denied”
Since the program was launched on April 1,2009 several updates have been made to counteract these roadblocks, however HARP remains unable to live up to the hype surrounding it. That said, today’s announcement, although appreciated, was broadly overlooked by skeptical mortgage professionals. John Rodgers, president of Prime Mortgage Lending in Apex, North Carolina, had this to say:
“It appears that the Obama Administration is aware of the constraints blocking borrowers from lower mortgage payments. Unfortunately, today’s update will likely prove ineffective in lowering those barriers. At this point granting appraisal waivers, allowing reduced documentation, and cutting loan level price adjusters appear to be the only way HARP will ever be effective. Otherwise HARP will turn out to be yet another loan program nobody can use, much like like FHA Secure and the Hope for Homeowners program.”
Nonetheless, borrowers who are in trouble with their mortgage should find out if they are eligible for a refinance or loan modification.
Thanks to Mortgagenewsdaily.com
Confronting New Appraisal Rules, Impact on Housing of HVCC
Posted by Chas W. Leeper, SRA in Help for Buyers, Sellers & Homeowners, Help for Realtors / Brokers, Help for mortgage pros on July 2nd, 2009
By Paul Gores
RISMEDIA, July 2, 2009-(MCT/RISMedia)-When Chad Gartzke put his three-bedroom ranch home in Wauwatosa up for sale for $196,000, one of the first people to view it liked the house so much she was willing to pay $196,500 to make sure she got it.
Despite a tough residential real estate market, it looked liked smooth sailing for Gartzke, who already had his eye on a bigger house in Richfield for him and his family.
Then the appraisal came in.
The appraiser concluded the house was worth $190,000, a judgment based in part on information about sales of “comparable” area homes. In turn, the buyer’s mortgage lender didn’t want to finance a house for more than its appraised value.
After the appraiser refused to reconsider what Gartzke and his real estate agent considered a flawed valuation, they were left to try to salvage the sale with a new deal.
The buyer ultimately was able to come up with another $1,000 for the down payment, and Gartzke reluctantly lowered the selling price to $191,000.
“Honestly, had we not had another house lined up that we wanted to purchase, we probably would have just called the whole deal off and tried our luck with another buyer and another appraiser,” Gartzke said.
Gartzke’s case isn’t an isolated one, real estate and mortgage professionals say. They contend home values, already hurt by the bad economy, sometimes are being worsened unnecessarily by low appraisals stemming from new rules meant to prevent the kind of puffed-up valuations and conflicts of interest that helped fuel the housing bubble.
Under an industry code of conduct that took effect May 1, mortgage brokers, real estate agents and loan officers are prohibited from selecting home appraisers. In order to avoid trouble with the rule, called the Home Valuation Code of Conduct, many lenders are hiring companies that put together pools of appraisers and then assign them to individual housing transactions, they say. The code applies to mortgages that will be sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Real estate agents and mortgage brokers say it has led to an increase in questionable or stingy valuations by appraisers who are leery of producing estimates that are too high, or who may be from outside the housing market and unfamiliar with the nuances of neighborhoods to which they’re sent.
“On one of the condos we just got an accepted offer for in the West Bend market, the appraiser that went out there was somebody from Racine,” said Scott Stortz, the owner-broker of Star Properties in Jackson.
Home appraisals that come in at lower-than-agreed-upon sale prices can kill deals, some say. At the very least, industry professionals say, they are delaying sales and undermining momentum that the housing market needs to regain. They say the drop in appraised values often is particularly large for high-end homes for which there now are few recent comparable sales, and argue the appraisal can cripple plans to sell or refinance — even when everything else seems in order.
“The appraisal is really the one and only subjective item in the loan file because it’s the opinion of the appraiser,” said Brian Wickert, president of Accunet Mortgage in Butler.
Nationwide impact
Last week, Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of Realtors, said poor appraisals are “stalling transactions” nationwide.
“Lenders are using appraisers who may not be familiar with a neighborhood, or who compare traditional homes with distressed and discounted sales,” Yun said. “In the past month, stories of appraisal problems have been snowballing from across the country with many contracts falling through at the last moment. There is danger of a delayed housing market recovery and a further rise in foreclosures if the appraisal problems are not quickly corrected.”
Congress has been listening to testimony on the issue.
The appraisers, however, say their valuations simply reflect what’s happened to the market over the last few years.
Bill Garber, director of government and external relations for the national Appraisal Institute, said appraisals are meant to be a risk-management tool for lenders “who typically don’t want to lend beyond what the value of the collateral is worth.”
Late last week, Representatives Childers (D-MS) and Miller (R-CA) introduced legislation requesting an 18 month moratorium on the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC).
“The introduction of this legislation is a victory for consumers and members of the industry alike,” said NAMB President Marc Savitt, CRMS. “We thank Congress for recognizing the need to address the issue of appraiser coercion without causing undue harm to borrowers or diminishing competition in the marketplace.”
NAMB has taken an active stance against the HVCC since its introduction in March of 2008. “We urge Congress to pass H.R. 3044 as soon as possible to ensure that more borrowers will not be negatively impacted by this de facto rule,” stated Savitt. “In the period of time since its implementation, the HVCC has increased costs to consumers and decreased the quality of appraisals and has provided a level of uncertainty in an ailing housing market. Tens of thousands of consumers have already been robbed of their opportunity to enjoy historically low rates by Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s rule.”
“Appraisers don’t make the market. They simply report what is occurring within the markets, and they are sort of the eyes and ears of the lender,” said Garber, whose organization is the nation’s largest association of appraisers. “In the end, it’s really a lending decision.”
Garber said that failure to enforce rules meant to keep appraisers separate from real estate agents and mortgage brokers-who, of course, make money when home sales and refinancings are successful-had put appraisers “under fire from these parties with a vested interest for many years.”
“People who stand to benefit by the closing of these loans are no longer in the position they once were in terms of dictating the appraisal process,” Garber said.
Response too late
There’s little doubt there was collusion nationwide in past years between some appraisers and lenders, which led to abuse, said Steve La Due, vice president of business development for Waterstone Mortgage in Pewaukee. It wasn’t widespread here, he said, but everyone must obey the new rules.
“The government’s response to appraisal problems is they are locking the barn door after the horse is gone in a big way,” he said.
Mike Polega of Re/Max Realty 100, who was Gartzke’s Realtor, said he’s concerned that low appraisals are having a negative effect on a real estate market that had been picking up.
“I’m not proclaiming that a half-million homes or more were lighting the world on fire, but that engine at the lower end was starting to build back up and there was some confidence-building going on. It’s this kind of thing that dampens that kind of spirit,” Polega said. “To me, that’s the bigger consequence of this.”
Copyright © 2009, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.